Thursday, 13 November 2014

Arrest George Galloway

Arrest Him Now

 
 
 
 
BELOW IS THE ARREST NOTICE FOR GEORGE GALLOWAY – READ IT AND THEN SIGN AT THE BOTTOM USING THE "POST A COMMENT" UNDER THIS POST  (WHERE IT WILL BE SENT TO GEORGE GALLOWAY, THE HOME SECRETARY AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ADVISING THEM THAT HE IS UNDER ARREST) – PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU SHARE IT ON FACEBOOK AND TWITTER USING THE SOCIAL MEDIA BUTTONS AFTER YOU SIGN IT.

FAO: George Galloway, CC: Home Secretary, Director of Public Prosecutions, and Galloway's Management (Agent)

George Galloway, You are hereby formally notified in writing that I have placed you under arrest under the powers contained within section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1974.

Arrest without warrant: other persons

 
(1)A person other than a constable may arrest without a warrant—
(a)anyone who is in the act of committing an indictable offence;
(b)anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be committing an indictable offence.
(2)Where an indictable offence has been committed, a person other than a constable may arrest without a warrant—
(a)anyone who is guilty of the offence;
(b)anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be guilty of it.
(3)But the power of summary arrest conferred by subsection (1) or (2) is exercisable only if—
(a)the person making the arrest has reasonable grounds for believing that for any of the reasons mentioned in subsection (4) it is necessary to arrest the person in question; and
(b)it appears to the person making the arrest that it is not reasonably practicable for a constable to make it instead.
4)The reasons are to prevent the person in question—
(a)causing physical injury to himself or any other person;
(b)suffering physical injury;
(c)causing loss of or damage to property; or
(d)making off before a constable can assume responsibility for him.

In line with this legislation I am placing you under arrest because you have repeatedly demonstrated that you are incapable of abiding by the law, namely section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 which is an indictable offence and meets the requirement of part 1 of section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1974 .

Furthermore with this legislation I am placing you under arrest because I have reasonable grounds for suspecting you to be guilty of breaking the law, satisfying part 2(b) section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1974 .

In addition to this it is my belief that the police may not be aware of your offence and as a result have not arrested you themselves and that you may make off before a constable can assume responsibility for you. This satisfies parts 3 & 4 of section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1974 .
As all conditions of section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1974 have now been met you can consider yourself formally under arrest.

What you have been arrested for:

It is my belief that you are guilty of offences under section 127 of the communications act 2003.
You have always engaged in unpopular and offensive activity including comments and statements on said social media and in a public forum in Leeds but in more recent months have escalated to highly offensive and indeed discriminatory behaviour.

In recent days you have escalated to racially motivated attacks which are both extremely offensive, obscene and menacing.

Section 127 of the communications act 2003 states:
Improper use of public electronic communications network
(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.
(2)A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,
(b)causes such a message to be sent; or
(c)persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.
(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.
(4)Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to anything done in the course of providing a programme service (within the meaning of the Broadcasting Act 1990 (c. 42)).
 
What happens now:



 
You can now consider yourself formally under arrest. You are to immediately convey yourself to your local police station. The Home Secretary & The Director of Public Prosecutions have both been attached to this notice and have been notified of your offences and that you have been arrested for them under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1974 .
 
They are hereby directed to wait a suitable amount of time (5 days) for you to turn yourself in to the police or the police are to be directed to attend your home and assume responsibility for you, at which time you will be processed and questioned.
 
We are formally advising the relevant authorities to formally investigate and prosecute you based on the evidence.
 
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
 

For more information on George Galloway's racism in Leeds see these links:

http://www.brennerbrief.com/galloway-wont-prosecuted-repeats-israel-free-threat/
 

 
                               ***************************************

Note:

According to the website, Arrest Katie Hopkins, her Tweets are "racist".

So why didn't they create a website to call for the arrest of George Galloway? He called for violence against any Israelis who dared to visit Bradford.

I only made a fuss about Galloway because of hypocrisy like this. It wasn't that I really wanted him arrested. It was that similar comments about Muslims would have seen his head roll... as may be the case with Katie Hopkins.

Why is the Left so selective?

The hypocrisy is both blatant and staggering.

The Left have tried this sort of stuff well before Katie Hopkins. Indeed George Galloway himself has tried to use the law to enforce his own political opinions (see video below).

Since Leftists rule large sections of the law, it's no wonder they are bypassing the democratic system and using the law to enforce Leftist behaviour and even Leftist thought.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHY7VkWrOoM












 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment