Wednesday, 1 February 2017


Get ready for Leftist many demos. Prepare yourself for much Leftist violence.

It seems that, because the law, universities, churches, etc. have been taken over by the Left, we most prepare for violence. I don't have a fetish for violence myself, as many International Socialists and National socialists do. I've simply realised that violence – “by any means necessary” - will be used against Trump.

Is it the case that because the democratically-elected Trump has faced so much lawfare, and his supporters so much violence on the streets, that we really need to realise what actions and attitudes are needed to counteract the fascist Left.

The Liberal-Left will fight against every Trump action and against the voter. Against ever word that Trump utters. Although the Left is elite, they can make a lot of noise precisely because making a lot of noise is what such Leftists do.

What are we going to do about this Leftist authoritarianism? For a start, we need to secure democracy from the violent Left. Above that, we need to realise that the Left wants total control no matter what.

In other words, we have to do what Nazi and Soviet dissidents did. Can we do that?

Sally Yates/Leftist Lawyers vs. Trump's Democracy

Lawyers have control and power which is way beyond many voters' knowledge and control. Indeed they've a political independence from politicians too.

The division of power is a good idea if the judiciary, lawyers, etc. form a broad spectrum. However, what if they're all Left-Liberals who're intent on thwarting democracy and thereby establishing a liberal/leftist society and state?

Lawyers almost constitute a state which is parallel to a government (in Trump's case). Put simply, no one votes for lawyers. They gain their jobs primarily because professional expertise and, more often than not, because of their strong political biases.

Take Sally Yates.

She's the just-sacked US Attorney General. She's said that female lawyers are becoming “the new heroes” in the Leftist war against Donald Trump’s travel ban. Yet over 61 million people voted for this ban and policies like it. Thus Leftist middle-class lawyers are rubbing the faces of voters in the dirt.

Trump's order placed a 90-day travel ban on people from seven countries, preventing citizens from Syria, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from being accepted for visas to enter the US.

Lawyers are vain creatures. 

Leftist lawyers also bathe in their unelected political power. Lisa Bloom, for example, said that “lawyers are the new heroes, particularly female lawyers”. Who the hell is Lisa Bloom? Good question. She's not a politician, which means that not a soul has ever voted for her. Instead, she runs The Bloom Firm in Los Angeles. Lisa Bloom is explicit about her political intentions. She said:

We take on very powerful people who violate the civil rights of ordinary Americans. We do sex discrimination cases, race discrimination cases and police misconduct cases every day.”

Ms Bloom, as a Liberal/Leftist lawyer, is keen on political activism, especially political activism which thwarts the will of the people. And that's why she, along with other lawyers, travelled to Los Angeles International Airport. Why did she do that? To offer services to possible terrorists and those being detained as a result of Trump's travel ban.

Lisa Bloom also managed to add a feminist angle to her political activism, which I'm sure Muslim immigrants and pretend refugees will much appreciate. She said:

There were a lot of lawyers there, which is wonderful. We stand ready and able and willing to help in any way that we can.

Then she mentioned the Women's March, which I'm sure gladdened the hearts of the feminist Muslim Brotherhood and those Syrians who simply adore feminism. She said:

The women’s march which I attended in Washington DC was such a powerful march. I think women are rising up.”

Here she explicitly articulated the power of Leftist lawfare. Yes, she believes that the travel ban is “unlikely to hold”. Then she gave her Marxist interpretation of the travel ban by saying that it's “a violation of all of the laws that we have against racial and religious discrimination”.

The White House, which is now fully aware of the power of the ideology of international socialism amongst lawyers, made the following statement about the decision to remove Ms Yates from her position:

The acting Attorney General, Sally Yates, has betrayed the Department of Justice by refusing to enforce a legal order designed to protect the citizens of the United States. This order was approved as to form and legality by the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel.

Ms. Yates is an Obama Administration appointee who is weak on borders and very weak on illegal immigration.

It is time to get serious about protecting our country. Calling for tougher vetting for individuals travelling from seven dangerous places is not extreme. It is reasonable and necessary to protect our country.

Is such Leftism a minority sport?

It seemed otherwise when one saw the recent demonstrations. But Leftists have always been into demos and other kinds of “direct action”.

Take the UK's Trotskyist Stop the War Coalition, which managed to get over a million people to demonstrate against the Iraq War in 2003. I say that the Stop the War Coalition is Trotskyist, which isn't also to say that all supporters and demonstrators are Trotskyists. What matters is who controls, runs and organises these demos, not the personal details of every demonstrator.

The Left will always take to the streets. Will always use violence against opponents. And will also believe in closing down free speech. Don't be swayed by the many automatons who go on these demos. For every one of these middle-class Leftists on a demo there are hundreds of patriots at home or at work trying to live their lives.

Tuesday, 31 January 2017

“Kill Trump”, Reverse Brexit... then what?

There have been numerous calls for the assassination of Donald Trump from anti-Trump activists recently. Almost every day there is a Leftist call to violence. However, have these anti-Trump activists actually thought this through? -

i) I assume that Mike Pence would take Trump's place.
ii) There'd be massive and unparalleled anger and frustration from the 61 million and more who voted for Trump.

If an assassination had happened before the inauguration, some said that the Presidency would've been Obama's again! Of course, the Left would like that in the sense that when democracy goes the way they want it to go, then they're happy with democracy. When it doesn't, well...

In any case, would anti-Trump bigots be happy with Mike Pence taking over? In many respects, Pence is more evil that Trump. After all, the hatred and bigotry of the Left isn't that discriminating. In other words, they hate Pence more than they hate Trump. Yes, the ultra-violent Left has called for Pence's assassination too! (What next, a Gulag for all Trump supporters?) The Left has also called for the death of Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, Tommy Robinson, etc. And, historically, Pim Fortune (in 2002) and Theo van Gogh (in 2004) were assassinated, in Holland, by a Leftist and Muslim respectively.

Perhaps if Trump were assassinated, there would be reciprocal assassinations or other killings from the Right. Although the Republican Right doesn't riot (or try to bypass democracy), an assassination of a much-loved leader is a different thing entirely. Perhaps those filled with deep anger would blow-up, say, Leftist universities or the offices of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The are many potential targets on the Left. Now would these sallow Leftist proponents of violence be able to take their own medicine?

Clearly, if the Left calls for the murder of Trump (as well as for bannings galore, censorship, etc.), then the rule of law, effectively, no longer exists. And when the rule of law no longer exists, the Right can fight back like-for-like. Madonna, Rosie MacDonald, etc. are calling for political violence. And that violence, in  the end, will work both ways.

In any case, the Left – Hollywood stars an' all – are dicing with death here. No one can forecast the repercussions of an assassination of Donald Trump, who's one of the most popular Republicans of recent history.

Anti-Trump activists seem to have a thing for violence, whether that's punching and beating-up Trump supporters or murdering the American President. All this is a very Khmer Rouge (or perhaps a Red Guards) kind-of-a-thing. 

The Left is taking democracy away from us - “by any means necessary” (a soundbite they're very keen on). And we aren't just talking about the “anti-fash” Antifa here, with their fetishisation of violence (which seems to appeal to legions of skinny 21-year-old-men dressed in black and wearing hoodies). We're also talking about the Marxist prophets of violence who teach at some of the best know American and British universities. You know, the beer-bellied middle-aged Leftist professors who try to have sex with gullible students.

And what about Brexit?

Say that Brexit was ultimately unsuccessful - as the petulant and spoilt Remainers demand. Are the seventeen-and-a-half million people who voted for Brexit going to lie down and take this affront to democracy? Of course not! As before, the Remainers are playing a game which they will ultimately be unable to control.

What's happening here is that Leftist academics, actors, lawyers, etc. are calling for a violent revolution. So what happens when their opponents realise that this violent revolution is on the cards? Will the Right disappear or will it fight back? Do I need to answer that question?

Does the civil war start here?

Monday, 30 January 2017

Why Leftists Can Organise Such Large Demonstrations

One thing that should always be kept in mind is that the Left puts its entire soul into demonstrations and believes, as a matter of faith, in “political activism”. That's why they can raise large numbers for any demo that's in fashion at the time. Conservatives, and those on the Right, on the other hand, believing in running their shops, keeping their businesses going, having a life, etc.

The result of this activism- or demo-fixation is that the Left always seems stronger than it actually is. You have groups like the Stop the War Coalition, the People's Assembly (all run by Trotskyist ex-SWP), Black Lives Matter, etc. run by a tiny minority of Leftists who're managing to tap into the guilt of white middle-class Leftists.

When students go to university, they recall films and documentaries they've seen of student political activism in the 1960s. All loudhailers and brainless soundbites. Thus the young middle-class think to themselves: I want a bit of that.

This is the Leftist right-of-passage that can be expected from the University Left. Lots of people who dress the same, think the same, and even act the same. Revolution is a product. It's a right-of-passage which numerous left-wing middle-class whites indulge in every year in every British and American university. It is utter conformity, whether in dress or ideas. Indeed many young “revolutionaries” are the children of parent revolutionaries who did exactly the same thing in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s.

Leftism has taken over the universities. You now have herds of people who look the same and think the same. Now how healthy is that?

The Quebec Mosque Killings: A Day in the Life of a BBC News Story

How ironic it is that on the day that many people are protesting against Donald Trump's actions regarding Muslim refugees and nationals (actually, states that happen to be Muslim), one Muslim refugee and a native Quebecan attack a mosque in Quebec and kill six people.

Earlier today, BBC News (the BBC's internet news outlet) was very keen to highlight the possibility that the killings were an example of “Islamophobia”. Indeed the attack was its main item. (The story itself went under the heading: 'Quebec City mosque shooting: Six killed, eight wounded'.) So much so that it concentrated on Quebecan racism (as many other papers have) and a previous attack on a Quebecan mosque – when a pig's head was placed in the doorway! This is what the BBC wrote:

In June last year the same mosque was the target of an Islamophobic incident when a pig's head was left in front of the building, with a card saying 'bonne appetit'. Eating pork is forbidden in Islam.”

As news began to come in that one attacker was, in fact, a Moroccan Arab, the BBC's main news itself was changed to yet more of its repetitive anti-Trump stuff. (The main news item was now: 'Trump executive order: Million sign petition to stop UK visit'.) 

Whatever the situation is, at first people like Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were hoping - or even praying - that this was a “Islamophobic” attack. Trudeau, for example, said:

"Muslim-Canadians are an important part of our national fabric, and these senseless acts have no place in our communities, cities and country."


This might well have been another violent act in the 1,400-year-old Sunni-vs.-Shia Islamic civil war. As it is, though, the rumours are that the Quebecan mosque is Ahmadiyya. Both Sunnis and Shia regard Ahmadiyya as non-Muslims. (Or as “animals”.) Indeed, in virtually all Sunni countries, Shia and Ahmadiyya mosques have frequently been attacked by Sunni terrorists. Now it seems that this has come to Europe – as it was bound to do!

This is a list of the Sunni states/peoples which/who persecute Ahmadiyya Muslims:

Saudi Arabia

Sunnis also persecute Ahmadiyya in non-Muslim countries, such as the United Kingdom, Bulgaria and Belgium.

What about Shia in Sunni countries? They're persecuted in the following countries:

Saudi Arabia

Indeed, Shia are bombed and terrorised even in Shia-majority countries, such as Iraq.

The bottom line is that just as Islam was bound to bring terrorism, sexual slavery, sharia law, etc. to Europe and America; so the Islamic Sunni-vs.-Shia civil war was bound to arrive here too.

This Islamic violence will never dissipate. It will only get worse.

Sunday, 29 January 2017

The Southern Poverty Law Center's List of Far-Leftist Eviltons

This is the premier for-political-profit organization monitoring the activities of domestic unnice groups and other left-wing extremists – including the SWP, Black Lives Matter, the neo-International Socialist Movement, neo-Chomskyan Disciples, anti-racist potheads, anti-government Antifa and other anarchist militias, Islamic-identity adherents, transgenderbinexusoppositionalists, cunts, people who stare at you on bus, etc.

Trotskyist Groups

Fourth International Caucus, International Socialist Organization, League for the Revolutionary Party, Radical Women Revolutionary Workers League (U.S.), Socialist Organizer, Socialist Workers Organization (U.S.), Solidarity (U.S.), Spark (U.S. organization), Spartacist League (US) and Workers Vanguard.

Communist Groups

Communist Party USA, Communist Party USA (Provisional), Party for Socialism and Liberation, Progressive Labour Party (United States), Revolutionary Communist Party, USA Workers World Party.

Leftist Terrorists Dealt With in the Past. (They've now “taken over the institutions”.)

The Weather Underground, the Students for a Democratic Society, the Symbionese Liberation Army, Communist Organization, the United Freedom Front, Death To Whitey, etc.

We’re currently tracking more than 1,600 extremist Leftist and Islamic groups operating across the U.K and U.S, including the SPLC. We publish investigative reports (with lots of footnotes and references), train law-enforcement officers (to indulge in lawfare) and share key intelligence with people who believe exactly what we believe, and offer expert, unbiased, objective analysis to the mainstream platonic media and stuff like that.

Extremist Files

Extremists in the U.S. come in many different forms – Palestinian and black nationalists, anti-white zealots, anti-racist potheads, neo-Confucians and more.

Terror From the Left

A synopsis of radical-Left terrorist plots, conspiracies and anti-racist rampages since the Weathermen's bombings in the 1960s and 70s.

Lawfare: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) vs. Donald Trump

I noted today's news item about an American judge who's issued a temporary halt of Trump's deportation of the refugees who're beached at airports.

What we should always do in these situations is ask two questions:

i) Which judge is taking this action? And
ii) Which institution has brought the case (for the judge to hear)?

As ever, we have a case of Leftist lawfare versus voter-democracy here.

As it is, the ruling came from federal Judge Ann Donnelly (in New York). She's effectively prevented the removal from the US of people with approved refugee applications, valid visas, and "other individuals... legally authorised to enter the United States".

What's more, the emergency ruling said that there was a risk of "substantial and irreparable injury" (what does that mean?) to those affected.

In this instance it was American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which filed the case. The ACLU is at war with Donald Trump and it is so on every conceivable front. (Simply download its website to see.)

Take these titles from today's ACLU website (all on the front page):

'He [Trump] Discriminated, We Sued',
'ACLU Blocks Trump's Unconstitutional Muslim Ban',
'Trump Begins His Unconstitutional Program of Anti-Muslim Discrimination',
'We’ll See You in Court: Why Trump’s Executive Order on Refugees Violates the Establishment Clause',
'Demand Transparency from Trump', etc.

Unlike Hope Not Hate, and even the Southern Poverty Law Center, the American Civil Liberties Union doesn't hide - or dissimulate about - its far-Left politics. And neither does it hide - or be modest about - the sense of power it has over the democratic system.

What we have here, again, is Leftist lawfare. More specifically, we have:

non-democratic non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and law firms vs. a democratically-elected President.

Indeed all the places in which Leftism thrives function and exist without the public vote and without the people's endorsement. That's not strange: Leftist activism is anathema to most voters. Thus these Gramscian (or Salinskyian) “institutions” run parallel political systems: parallel to government, local councils, the law (they are the law) and so on. Politics and even revolution itself are slyly carried out under the noses of voters. This is the revolution - or the “radical restructuring of society” - which has been going on since the 1960s (if not before).


In terms of the details of the present case. Trump's executive order has halted the US refugee programme and, in addition, instituted a 90-day travel ban for nationals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Clearly, Leftist institutions - such as the ACLU - will fight tooth and nail against policies like this which work directly against socialist internationalism.

Trump himself, however, is happy with how things are going. He told reporters:

"It's working out very nicely. You see it at the airports, you see it all over."